Author(s): Blumenberg, Evelyn and Daniel Hess
Published: 2003 by Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1859: 93-101
Online Access: http://trb.metapress.com/content/jv2063327u88tw7w/fulltext.pdf
Abstract: Welfare-to-work transportation programs are premised on a conceptualization of the spatial mismatch hypothesis that focuses on the physical separation between the central city locations of welfare participants, rapidly expanding job opportunities in the suburbs, and the long commutes needed to connect them. Using data from three diverse California counties, this study examines welfare recipients spatial access to employment. The study finds that the traditional notion of the spatial mismatch is less relevant to welfare recipients, many of whom live in counties in which the urban structure does not fit the simple model of poor, central-city neighborhoods and distant, job-rich suburbs. Many welfare recipients live in job-rich areas; others live in neighborhoods that are spatially isolated from employment. To be effective, therefore, transportation policies must be tailored to the diverse characteristics of the neighborhoods in which welfare recipients live.
Category: Transportation Access and Equity Transportation, Employment, and Poverty
See other articles by the author(s): Evelyn A. Blumenberg Daniel B. Hess