Royce Hall Santa Monica Beach Redline Metro skyshot LA Line Traffic
Title: Autos, Transit and Bicycles: Comparing the Costs in Large Chinese Cities

Author(s): Wang, Rui

Published: 2011 by Transport Policy, 18:139-146

Online Access: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MiamiImageURL&_cid=271794&_user=4423&_pii=S0967070X10000910&_check=y&_origin=&_coverDate=31-Jan-2011&view=c&wchp=dGLzVlt-zSkWb&md5=8e2a3e92dd9b2e7027dc7ff74ee5838b/1-s2.0-S0967070X10000910-main.pdf

Abstract: This study compares the full costs of seven passenger modes in the large Chinese cities facing the difcult yet crucial choice among alternative passenger transportation systems. The seven modes are evaluated at varied trafc volumes in hypothetical radial and circumferential commuting corridors. Using detailed estimates of private and social costs, the full cost of each mode is minimized by optimizing infrastructure investment and operation plans. On all corridors and across different scenarios, commuting by one or more forms of bus transit or bicycle costs less than automobile or rail. Nonetheless, in circumferential corridors, rail can be almost as cost-effective as bus under certain conditions, and bicycle can be less cost-effective than bus in some cases. Unlike results from similar studies conducted in the US, automobile commuting does not cost less than bus transportation at low trafc volumes.


See other articles by the author(s):

Institute of Transportation Studies
University of California, Los Angeles
3320 Public Affairs Building
Los Angeles, CA 90095

tel: 310.562.7356
email: its@luskin.ucla.edu

Lewis Center UCTC ITS Home ITS Home