New research briefs: Learning from three green transportation programs in California

There are more cars on California roads than ever before, threatening the state’s air quality. And landmark new investments in transit and transportation infrastructure could endanger wildlife habitats and sensitive environments.

Researchers with the University of California Institute of Transportation Studies — a network of faculty, students, and staff with branches at UC Berkeley, UC Davis, UC Irvine, and here at UCLA — have produced three research briefs to understand how efforts around the state are mitigating the impact of transportation on California’s environment. The briefs examine what lessons these programs can offer policymakers.

Can Smog Repairs Create Social Justice? The Tune In & Tune Up Smog Repair Program in the San Joaquin Valley
Gregory Pierce and Rachel Connolly
Pierce, an assistant professor at UCLA Luskin and senior researcher at the Luskin Center for Innovation, and Connolly, a graduate student researcher at the Luskin Center, studied an emission testing and smog repair program aimed at combating environmental injustice in one of the state’s most disadvantaged regions (mapped above). In places like the San Joaquin Valley, where the lack of density makes robust public transit options unrealistic, can a smog repair program achieve the emissions reductions necessary to improve air quality and benefit car-dependent, lower-income households?

Design and Implementation of the Enhanced Fleet Modernization Plus Up Pilot Program
Gregory Pierce and J.R. DeShazo
Replacing older, heavily-polluting cars with cleaner, more fuel-efficient vehicles is a first step to greener travel in California. Two UCLA ITS faculty fellows, Pierce and Luskin Center director DeShazo, looked at a pilot program, implemented in the San Joaquin Valley and South Coast air quality districts, to increase incentives for lower-income households to upgrade to hybrid or electric vehicles. What lessons does the program provide the state’s other 33 districts about reaching the most critical households?

Lederman, a UCLA Luskin PhD student, reviewed how transportation agencies try to streamline the permitting process for infrastructure projects while protecting vulnerable environments through the use of Regional Habitat Conservation Plans. RHCPs allow for one permit to cover projects across multiple jurisdictions for decades, requiring unique collaboration between agencies and other stakeholders. How do they both improve ecological outcomes and strengthen regional infrastructure planning?

Recent Posts

Cyclists ride along a red-paved fietstraat (bike street) in a quiet Dutch residential neighborhood, where a blue sign indicates that cars are guests. The street runs parallel to a narrow canal lined with trees and tidy homes.

‘Active travel’ study identifies pathways for designing walking- and cycling-friendly cities

In largest study to date, research found city-level policies reduce global emissions by 6% and create about $435 billion in health benefits.

Supervisor Janice Hahn speaks at a UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies event, seated next to Jim Newton. The two are at a table on a stage with a blue UCLA Luskin tablecloth, addressing a seated audience. A projection behind them displays their photos, names and titles.

Leaders see a transit legacy in the LA28 Games

From bus lanes to better sidewalks, improvements could fuel transit ridership in Los Angeles beyond the Olympics and Paralympics.

Featured Content