Why is Public Transit Falling in the San Francisco Bay Area, and What Might be Done About It?
Policy Brief

Program Area(s):

Date: February 26, 2020

Author(s): Brian D. Taylor, Evelyn Blumenberg, Jacob L. Wasserman, Mark Garrett

Abstract

Transit ridership in the San Francisco Bay Area started declining in 2017, most noticeably on busses and off-peak trips. Ridership has become more commute-focused, with ridership at peak hours increasing dramatically. This study found that transit is losing riders overall, but drawing more commuters from non-traditional users. Additionally, the job-housing imbalance in the Bay Area is depressing transit ridership by increasing commute distances. Ridehail may also be a factor in ridership decline, providing an alternative to transit. Transit decline does not appear to be caused by factors within the control of transit operators. Regional policymakers should seek to improve transit service, push for transit oriented development, and create demand-based fares, among other strategies.

About the Project

Public transit ridership has been falling nationally and in California since 2014. The San Francisco Bay Area, with the state’s highest rates of transit use, had until recently resisted those trends, especially compared to Greater Los Angeles. However, in 2017 and 2018 the region lost over five percent (>27 million) of its annual riders, despite a booming economy and service increases. This report examines Bay Area transit ridership to understand the dimensions of changing transit use, its possible causes, and potential solutions. We find that: 1) the steepest ridership losses have come on buses, at off-peak times, on weekends, in non-commute directions, on outlying lines, and on operators that do not serve the region’s core employment clusters; 2) transit trips in the region are increasingly commute-focused, particularly into and out of downtown San Francisco; 3) transit commuters are increasingly non-traditional transit users, such as those with higher incomes and automobile access; 4) the growing job-housing imbalance in the Bay Area is related to rising housing costs and likely depressing transit ridership as more residents live in less transit-friendly parts of the region; and 5) ridehail is substituting for some transit trips, particularly in the off-peak. Arresting falling transit use will likely require action both by transit operators (to address peak capacity constraints; improve off-peak service; ease fare payments; adopt fare structures that attract off-peak riders; and better integrate transit with new mobility options) and public policymakers in other realms (to better meter and manage private vehicle use and to increase the supply and affordability of housing near job centers).