Date: June 10, 2022
Author(s): Ryota Abe, Matthew Forbes, Emily Marshall, Marium Navid, Karleigh Shepard
Abstract
In order to uptake of electric vehicles (EV) into last mile delivery, we recommend the deployment of a combination of novel and existing policies to both encourage widespread EV uptake and discourage the use of diesel-based freight through zero emission delivery zones and purchase subsidies. Our research is composed of three methods: Interviews, Quantitative Modeling, and Quantitative Modeling. The interviews and quantitative analysis revealed that the burden on delivery companies is greater than the social benefits such as GHG reductions due to the large investment in EVs. The effectiveness of the policy combination was also confirmed. Using the three criteria of Political Feasibility, Efficiency, and Equity, we evaluated the policies using the Criteria-Alternative Matrix and concluded that the voluntary ZEDZ is the most effective stand-alone policy. Since no one pollutant reducing policy can meet all criteria effectively we recommend packaging various policies together. Our model demonstrates that a combination of policies produce the highest results in decreasing costs and pollutant levels, particularly a combination of purchase subsidies and mandated ZEDZ. To better improve equity scores, we recommend cities consider adding purchase subsidies of freight electric vehicles to a ZEDZ program to offset costs businesses would incur, particularly small businesses transitioning to electric vehicle fleets. Mandated ZEDZ would add additional burdens on small businesses since these companies don’t have the capital to transform fleets.
About the Project
This report partially fulfills the requirements for the Master in Public Policy degree in the Department of Public Policy at the University of California, Los Angeles.